Відео

Yep, what muslims have done to atheist, and LGBT people is deplorable, glad Israel is stepping in to save lives 🇮🇱☺️

@@vondas1480 Lol where are you getting your news from?

CRT is a legal theory that argues laws and legal frameworks shaped American racism Try reading something like Yick Wu v Hopkins or anything on Jim Crow. CRT is American legal history. Check out the CRT amendments in the constitution: -13th Amendment -14th Amendment -15th Amendment

Zionists pretending like genocide wasn't a word people used outside of the Geneva convention. The use of paramilitary groups to go from village to village to murder and remove the native population to make lebensraum for your newly forming state and impose your invented language is genocide. Similarly indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas blockaded by your nation and forcing starvation and pestilence is genocide. The only remaining consideration is the access of journalists and independent fact gatherers to determine the scale but Israel is not escaping the common use of the word genocide (as is the the case with China or Myanmar). People aren't stupid. If you are good faith interested I recommend you read South afric'a submission for a fuller picture of Israel's atrocities.

Got it, telling someone to remove their swastica is genocide. What a meaningless term.

@@vondas1480 if by swastika you mean the original symbol (with orthogonal orientation) as used in various Asian cultures, then yes, forcibly taking that from them is genocide. If you mean the Nazi Hakenkreuz (diagonal orientation) then no, that's not a cultural symbol, it's the logo of a hate movement that committed genocide.

​@@nienke7713 You finding it distasteful doesn't make it not part of German culture, and objectively it was a national symbol which you stated is a protected category. And if you want to go the route of saying being hateful/genocidal disqualifies you as a culture then there would be no cultures at all except in the last few decades (which I'm fine with, as it excludes muslims and p*lestinines)

@@vondas1480 no, it's not a German national symbol, it's not part of German culture, it was the symbol of the Nazi Party, and that's not culture in any way

@@nienke7713 ah yes Germany had no national flag between 1935-1945. And who are you to tell millions of Germans what is and isn’t their own culture? I may want them bombed for their culture but by your own definition you’re the one committing genocide by claiming there’s doesn’t exist.

Yeah, there was a reason we put it small in the corner. Just trying out new things.

Some have been debunked. Others have not and the UN maintains that some did take place. Here's an article that both higlights the debinked accounts and shows that there is still evidence in other cases: (apnews.com/article/israel-hamas-gaza-sexual-violence-zaka-a12f75ddecab75989426f4dc24906ba9)

Islam has already been debunked numerous times your still here making a fool of yourself

As noted in the video, killing people is not the only way to commit a genocide. You can also force people from their homes by inflicting on them conditions calculated to make life unlivable. Over 80% of Gazans have become refugees because of Isreal's genocide. As noted in the video, genocide is about intent, not the share of a population killed.

​@@CarneadesOfCyrene The intent is to destroy Hamas terrorist organization that stated numerous times that its desire to wipe Israel off the map. It was stated multiple times, trying to outstretch "Amalek" or "human animals" (clearly a reference to Hamas' massacre on a music festival) is borderline blood libel. eastern germany was reduced to rubble and many 5M german were displaced, was it a genocide? According to these standarts, the battle on Mosul and the war in Iraq were also a ones.

​@@CarneadesOfCyrene The outstretch of taking gallant "human animals" and "Amalek" which obviously was said on the attack Hamas and the perpetrators of the Nova festival massacre is borderline blood libel. Both Dresden and Moscow were reduced to rubble and most citizens flew them during the war, does that make it a gen*cide? According to your ridiculous misuse of the term, even the batlle on Mosul was a genocide, as the vast majority of buildings were demolished, and most of the population became refugees.

Good to hear. Thanks!

So because you've arbitrarily decided which cultures are bad, it's okay to cause unprecedented suffering upon the civilians of said culture in the means of "cleansing" them? Nice definitely not psychopathic at all

⁠@@homiespaghetti1522ya? How did you arbitrarily decide “cleansing” was wrong? Did you use some kind of moral framework? Kind of similar to the one I use to judge cultures? Are you too much of a coward to criticize large groups? And what’s special about culture? There is no meaningful difference between a culture and a political club (except that it’s somehow acceptable to indoctrinate your children into joining). And like any political organization some are evil and should be destroyed. Here I’ll create a culture right now, it’s called “paleztinian” culture, we think human trafficking is great, do not criticize us, ok? See how ridiculous you sound.

What makes racial genocide immoral but not the other ones? Do you have some particular attachment to genetic diversity but not cultural/ideological diversity?

@@zyansheep I explained it in my comment and if you sort by new you can see my reply to the other person Basically you have no say in your race and it communicates nothing about you as an individual. You can say “I’m a European” and I would know nothing about and have no reason to wish you ill. Say “I’m an Irish catholic” or “I’m Amish” or “I’m a German NatSoc” or “I’m muslim” and I can make plenty of judgements about you. Genetic diversity serves a practical purpose, “cultural diversity” is Inevitably a mockery of itself, it’s tolerating the the intolerant until there’s no tolerance for anyone.

Did you even watch the video? The person who originally coined the term was all about culture. The reason race is an important factor is because there are often links between race and culture, just as there are links between nationality and culture, religion and culture, and in some cases even political ideology and culture. And whilst you are able to choose to change elements of your culture, you cannot choose what culture you were born into, and the attempt to destroy a culture is exactly what genocide is all about. Culture is not the same as views, though, it's things like traditions, rituals, holidays, customs, foods, and stories. Just look at people who come from a religious background but no longer believe, and you will often see people still participating in (secularised versions of) the culture (e.g. western Atheists still celebrating things like Easter and Christmas), or look at people who have moved but still practice cultural elements from where they came from.

It is unclear who he is referring to, but I think he could easily be interpreted as referring to all Palestinians, given that seconds earlier he bragged about depriving all Palestinians, not just Hamas of badic services. He says, "We are fighting human animals" (m.ua-cam.com/video/ZbPdR3E4hCk/v-deo.html) something which would constitute dehumanization, a key precursor of genocide regardless of if it is Hamas or Palestinians in general he is referring to.

It is unclear who exactly he is referring to, but given that seconds before he bragged about cutting off basic services to all Palestinians in Gaza City, not just Hamas, I think it is reasonable to assume he is talking more broadly. (m.ua-cam.com/video/ZbPdR3E4hCk/v-deo.html).

You didn't watch it didn't you

Population of GAZA has grown by almost a million in the last 16 years . That's a very strange type of genocide where the population actually increases The genocide is non existent

Another answer: alderaan

@@eduardtarniceriu102 The reason why the population of Gaza has increased is because of the displacement of Palestinians across occupied territory as Israel's border gets larger. Not becauseof birthrate, it would be impossible for a population to increase that much over the course of 16 years just through people having children

@@farahshah3072 The population of arabs in israel pre 48' was 850K. nowadays- 7M. Your numbers just don't add up.

The unintended consequences question is an interesting one. Mao's great leap forward comes to mind. If you think intent is required, then it would not qualify. If you think knowledge is sufficient, that is a harder question to answer. Some movements towards communism have led to horrible death tolls, other movements towards democratic socialism have not (see Scandinavian countries). So should a leader know whether their actions will go to far and tip over into a massive extinction? The answer is likely nuanced and specific to the country, the leader, and the specific proposal.

Yes there is indiscriminate bombing obviously. And you're only explanation is that the number would be much higher if it were indiscriminate. Based on what? That's a completely arbitrary statement that could be refuted by simply saying that the ratio would be lower if it were not indiscriminate. No, not every war is genocide but this attack on civilians definitely is.

@@enterthevoidIi If you (or this channel) thinks there is indiscriminate bombing, it is on you to prove this, not simply claim it. High numbers casualties alone doesn't prove that the bombing is indiscriminate. And why would the ration not be a good argument? If the bombing was random, one would expect way worse ratios, considering the ratio of civilian population in general to hamas fighters

​@@lukasmiller8531 Well, the problem is not that it cannot be proved. (it can, it's more than obvious - for example, in the first few months, more civilians, especially kids, were killed than in any other assault in modern warfare over such a short time). The problem is that gen0c-ide apologists such as yourself will claim it's not happening no matter how strong and clear the evidence is. Again, your argument is completely arbitrary. It's used to deflect, not to prove anything. Other than that, you've got nothing.

Happy to debate and talk through disagreements. That is what we are here for. A couple thoughts: First, remember that genocide does not require killing, just forced displacement (creating the conditions that make it impossible for life to continue in that place). The indiscriminate bombing has led to forced displacement of close to the entirety of the population. Netanyahu has refused to come up with a plan for Gaza after the war and there are indications that Isreal intends to annex at least part of the territory, completing the genocide of removing a people from a place. The share of Hamas causualties to civilian causualities is disputed, and President Herzog has claimed that the entire nation is responsible for the attacks, so I don't know if Isreal's assessment of who is a combatant should be trusted. Further, we can't draw a particular line between the ratio of civilians vs. combatants, meaning something is a genocide. The ratio of military personnel to civilians killed in WWII was 1:2, yet no one in their right mind would argue against the claim that at least one if not several genocides were committed in that war. In terms of intent, those were merely a few quotes because we would be here all day if I cited them all. There are many more, including from religious leaders, journalists, and other professionals throughout the country advocating for genocide. Soldiers boast of exterminating the cockroaches, including bragging about killing families, mothers, and children, taking pride in the destruction of homes, and desecrating places of worship. Read the UNHRC's report for citations for all these claims. Is all war genocide? I don't think so. It likely comes down to intent. Are you trying to "Bomb without distinction!!... flatten Gaza. Without Mercy! This time no room for mercy!" as Isreali politicians have ordered troops to do, then it is.

@@lukasmiller8531 the problem is not that I cannot prove it (it is more than obvious). The problem is that not matter how much proof there is, you will claim it's not happening.

Life saver

prop logic is easy shit

@@pawarranger sound & valid iykyk

I believe that we will very much regret the complete trivialization of these terms.

But also using what you said as a way to shut down people who call something genocide is not good either.

@@enterthevoidIi If there isnt an actual genocide going on of course you shouldnt take that seriously. Its not the truth. Not even in a subjective way; its provable by law/legal terms. If there is an actual genocide going on you should obviously take that seriously. What matters is whether its true/maps on to reality or not

Thanks! :) Good to hear.

you didn't really watch the video

Thanks!

​@@CarneadesOfCyrene If you delete comments, then eventually UA-cam will delete your channel, or free thinkers will delete UA-cam (we already are). Take your pick. You've already thrown down the gauntlet with your video, so, in for a penny, in for a pound. Censorship is illogical because it foments men like Locke to write, anonymously, revolutionary texts. Kind of like me telling you about declining EROEI. Eventually men aren't so comfortable being comfortable. 50% of Gaza is children. Censoring dissent won't change that. Genocide is the slaughter of people based on a cultural phenomenon such as race, religion, or creed. Unless the people with precious metal last names are involved, then its definition is in superposition. Because, "greatest ally."

​@@CarneadesOfCyrene Declining EROEI. Coward.

That's what I wanted to say. Seconded.

Good questions. The problem is that the line between a cult and a religion is blurry. And Some of the historical genocides that are covered are committed because someone claimed that a particular religion was a cult. The Christian missionaries that took Native children from their families thought they were saving those children, but, by some definitions they were destroying those cultures. The question would be, what makes a religion sufficiently immoral such that destroying it is not genocide? There have been religions that practice human sacrifice. Is genocide against them (perhaps of type 5) morally permissible? There are other religions/ethnic groups that engage in things that could be considered child abuse (e.g. FGM, gay conversion therapy, etc.). Does that justify removing children from such a culture, even if it has the consequence of destroying that culture? Are harmful cultures really worth saving? Who gets to decide what makes a culture harmful, since everyone that has committed a genocide, probably thinks the culture they are trying to destroy is harmful.

To start there is no such thing as race and intellectual algebra or substituting one unknown and undefined for another unknown/undefined such as x=y=x where neither x nor y are defined or ascribed a value assists no-one.. *All* war is one grouping or another with one or another set of characteristics trying to wipe out another, thus*All* war is pick any elastic neologism for sin or diddums-doesn't-like-it, you please. The sooner that pointless waste of space the UN is abolished the better -It is no more than a toothless talking shop and make- work for the otherwise employable. There is not and cannot be, any such thing as international law because law is a function of a sovereign(which means subject to *No* authority whatsoever) and there is not a nation country or people on this planet that does not suppose itself to be both sovereign and independent and there is a shortage of international sovereigns to the exact tune of *any-at-all*. So long as you are not entirely witles it is plain as day that national sovereignty and international law are mutually exclusive ideas. What the fanatical followers of that queer religion modernism want to do is elasticate the definition of that neologism genocide so that will fit any sin they do not like. Although there is no verb to genocide(and be grateful for that small mercy) in the second war the Nazis wanted to genocide anyone they did not like and then the allies wanted to genocide the Nazis and as by-catch, the German people and no -one was bleating about genocide then. The modernist loons and all beings would do well to look at the tuquoque fallacy and se if the can understand why it is a fallacy. Reflective justification of the but-please-miss-johnny-hit-me-first variety is infantile and helps no-one what to do when countries or peoples want to go in for mutual genocide or war? First off get rid of all that good/evil, right/wrong morals/ethics, religious mumbic jum, which only serves to stupefy those that go in for it. Genocide is a neologism it can mean anything you damn please which makes it effectively meaningless and little more than a cognate of Super_Sin and there is no doubt that the fanatical followers of that queer religion modernism are utterly obsessed with sin which stupefies them in that all that morality ethics nonsense is merely reactions of of the emotional(like/dislike) function or part of their common presences which makes them incapable of impartial(not from *only_one* part) reason. It is stupefying foolishness to dress up what are no more than subjective relative and temporary mechanical-automatic reactions of that on function or part as if they were not no more than subjective relative and temporary mechanical-automate ructions of that on function or part yo which men(human beings/dreaming machines) are such abject slaves they simply *cannot be indifferent to what in reality are no more than no more than subjective relative and temporary mechanical-automate reactions of that one function or part If *It reacts dislike then everything else goes out of the window and to the devil.Men(human beings/dreaming machines have many other functions than just that one emotional(like/dislike) function which is their god, lord, master- pick any one you please Are they remotely interested in freeing themselves from that slavery? To ask that question is to answer it.

@@CarneadesOfCyrene there’s nothing special about a culture, it’s literally just exclusive social club that some delusional and often racist people have arbitrarily elevated. I would feel more pity for an anime club being disbanded than any so called “cultural g enocide”. If it’s not targeting race, gender or sexual orientation it’s perfectly fine.

Sir that would just increase the child abuse rates. Think of the children

Are children not already stuffed full with religious mublic jum of the sort drivelled by that fool religious fanatic. there is *No_magic* in the neologism genocide which the loon seems to suppose to be some sort of super_sin. What fanatical folowers of that queer religion modernism want to do is to keep afjusting their whooly arbitrary and artificial definitions to suit anything they don't like, they being the abject slaves of that one function Wr is try to kill or capture or otherwise oppress a group known as the enemy thus all wars are genocide and if all wars are genocide and if eveything and anything you please is genocide then *Nothing* is genocide. Truly religion is the great stupefier of men(human beings/ dreaming machines) I*Everything* is a sin, the *Nothing is a sin but the fanatical followers of that fool religion modernism are so obsessed with sin that it completely stupefies them-as the author of that drivel illustrates.

​@@vhawk1951kl It's pretty illegible, bud. I don't read emotional.

@@skeetorkiftwon You obtained your law degree at which university titch? Illegal means contrary to the provisions of a criminal statute enacted by a sovereign. Which criminal statute enacted by which sovereign have you in mind little elsie? No law yer you titch. let's face it you Elsies - the Lower Classes are not exactly notorious for their wits and erudition,and you in particular are clearly wholly innocent of any sort of intellectual ability or accomplishment, which is why your best and only shot is rather feeble pious bleating about that of which you have neither knowledge or experience.Go back to the shallow end little Elsie.

By Palestine society is practised